![]() |
![]() |
|
INFORMATION SERIES: Aluminum Wiring |
|
|
|
|
|
During the period from approximately 1964 to the mid 1970s, many homebuilders and electricians used aluminum wiring in place of more expensive copper. Initially, it was believed that aluminum was an acceptable alternative for copper, but several years after q was introduced in the residential market it was implicated as the cause in a number of house fires. The origin of many of these fires was traced to failures at the points where the wire connected to receptacles and other devices on 15 and 20 amp household or small appliance circuits. Although improper wiring techniques were deemed to be the cause of some of the problems, the intrinsic physical characteristics of aluminum wire was a major factor. Aluminum wiring creates a greater resistance to electric current flow than copper. Consequently, an aluminum wire must he one size larger than copper to carry the same current load. If undersized, overheating can occur. Other common causes for high resistance and overheating include corrosion that develops from the contact of two dissimilar metals (aluminum wire to steel connector on old devices) or the natural oxidation of bare aluminum wire. Aluminum also has a greater thermal expansion/contraction rate and less resiliency to bending than copper. This creates problems with current flow at connection points. A connection can loosen due to poor installation practices but also due to the inability of the aluminum to adapt to the constant temperature changes. As the wire expands and Contracts with each use, the wire distorts and loosens, resulting in a gap between the wire and the connector that impedes the normal current flow This condition can lead to sparking and the igniting of adjacent combustible materials. The areas of the electrical system where the greatest concerns exist are often the outlets that are used most often and/or have a high amount of current flowing through them on a regular basis. Signs of imminent concerns include warm coverplates, flickering lights, sporadic appliance operation, inoperative receptacles or switches and the smell of burning plastic. But aluminum wire connections have been reported to fail without prior indications of a potential concern. Remedial
measures. Complete rewiring with copper is the optimum solution for
eliminating aluminum wire concerns, but. in most cases. this would not be
feasible and/or would be cost prohibitive. As an alternative, another
remedial option became available in the early 1970s as manufacturers
modified both But
the new CO/ALR receptacles and switches did not address the other aluminum
connections typically found in a house. such as those at light fixtures or
appliances. For these connections. the only alternative was to use copper
pigtails (using a wire-nut to connect a short piece of copper to the
aluminum, then connecting the copper directly to the device). Subsequent
warnings, however. issued by the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission
(CPSC). which had been studying the aluminum wire issue since problems
first surfaced, reported that the use of the CO/ALR devices improved the
performance of aluminum wire systems but did not eliminate the risk. It
also reported that the use of pigtails was questionable as CPSC research
indicated use of pigtails only moved the concern from one point in the
system to another (from the connection to the point where the wires were
spliced). |
This
new alternative, which is listed by Underwriters' Laboratories (UL) and is
in compliance with the electric code. utilizes a copper pigtail and
special heat sealed connector to provide protection against oxidation,
loosening or physical damage. The spliced wires are inserted into a
special metallic alloy tube and then crimped and covered will) a
protective plastic sleeve, which is then shrunk to a custom fit using a
heat gun. This crimped connector system is often referred to as a COPALUM
splice.
Unfortunately, this method never become available and/or accepted in many areas, leaving the homeowner no other choice but to use other, possibly less effective remedial methods. In the mid 1990s. however. a new type wire-nut designed for use with aluminum to copper connections was approved by UL. This new twist-on connector (labeled Twister AL-CU) has an internal spring to help hold the wires in place and is pre-filled with an anti-oxidant paste. This is an improvement over any standard wire-nuts previously available for pigtailing and now offers an alternative approach for addressing the concerns with aluminum connections. Current
considerations. By the late 1970s the use of aluminum wire on household
circuits had decreased significantly. Since that time, the magnitude of
the aluminum wire concerns have generally decreased because of the
identification of problem installations and the remedial measures that
have been performed. But there is generally still a higher potential
hazard concern with aluminum wire systems. It
is still generally recommended that all aluminum wire systems be checked
by an electrician prior to title transfer and periodically. Systems that
have not been upgraded in compliance with current recommendations should
be evaluated for any remedial procedures required. Where remedial
procedures have been performed, documentation on the scope and methods of
work and subsequent electrical inspections should be obtained. If a system
defect is observed the system should be checked immediately by an
electrician familiar with aluminum wiring and the accepted remedial
procedures. The
specific remedial action that may be recommended will vary with the
experience and opinion of the particular electrician or other electric
industry professional consulted and local practices. In all cases,
however, any work implemented must meet the current electric code
requirements. A homeowner should not attempt to perform repairs. While
the CPSC studies on aluminum wire systems continue, it considers the
COPALUM connector as the acceptable remedial measure for splices and
outlets throughout the house and at general purpose and small appliance
circuit connections at the electric panel. But since the COPALUM connector
continues to be unavailable in many areas, or may be cost prohibitive, the
use of a properly listed AL/CU twist-on connector may he a feasible
alternative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
| About
Us
| Services
| FAQ's
| Neighborhoods
| Media
| Kidz
Korner
| Links
| Scheduling
| Contact
Us
© 2007 ENCO Home Inspection, LLC
ENCO Home Inspection, LLC is a wholly, independently owned and operated franchisee of HMA Franchise Systems, Inc. The information and views provided within these web pages have no reflection on HMA, and HMA is held harmless from any statements, views, comments or otherwise.
End